1)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
extreme long wu's
(Message 2501)
Posted 20 Nov 2017 by xaminmo Post: I wish I'd looked more deeply into this before joining up. My favorite is a task listed as 30 days estimated runtime, but a due-date 14 days into the future. Of course I aborted that, but I shouldn't have to micromanage compute. They should be well behaved, self policing, etc. I did bump up to 7.8.4 client, just in case (kind of a hassle on xenial, but not too bad). It looks like U@H is not the only problematic project, but seems to have the biggest problems. IIRC, UID 1 has backed off of the project due to family constraints, and UID 2 basically owns the project. My guess is they just really do not have the time or resources to troubleshoot this fully, but are hesitant to kill the project either. |
2)
Message boards :
Cafe :
29 day task due in 12 days?
(Message 2500)
Posted 20 Nov 2017 by xaminmo Post: More digging, and this seems to be a known issue. SOP seems to be to abort any WU with an estimated runtime over 6 or 8 hours. All of the frustrations have already been discussed, with the most exhaustive thread being here: https://universeathome.pl/universe/forum_thread.php?id=199 It seems either monitor closely all the time, accept wasted cycles, or set to "No new tasks". |
3)
Message boards :
Cafe :
29 day task due in 12 days?
(Message 2499)
Posted 20 Nov 2017 by xaminmo Post: Anyone else getting impossible runtimes? I have jobs running from 2-4 days, which seem kind of greedy, but then I have a task that says 19 hours elapsed, 28 days and 11 hours remaining, due on December 2. It's not even worth calculating, because it's impossible to complete. I have 24 cores, and all of the U@H work items are single CPU. I'm all NVIDIA, so the ATI jobs don't run for me. ref: universe_bh2_160803_211_19369981_20000_1-999999_370200 BHspin2_1_x86-pc-linux-gnu https://universeathome.pl/universe/workunit.php?wuid=12816968 |