|
1)
Message boards :
News :
Work Units cancelled
(Message 274)
Posted 22 Apr 2015 by  Michael H.W. Weber
Post: You are completely right and I apologise for this. I have cancelled those WU's as soon as I noticed the bug. Thank you very much for your understanding. Michael. |
|
2)
Message boards :
News :
Work Units cancelled
(Message 271)
Posted 22 Apr 2015 by Michael H.W. Weber
Post: You guys need to CAREFULLY prepare and check your WU packets in the future BEFORE you release them into the wild if you like people to continue to help you with your project: I just wasted 12 hrs of CPU time PER CORE on multiple quad- and octacore machines because of your carelessness. I really don't care about the credits not granted but I do care very much about the energy bill which I have to pay for and which, under these circumstances, just contributes to global warming. Michael. |
|
3)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Large upload Files
(Message 266)
Posted 11 Apr 2015 by Michael H.W. Weber
Post: Danke für die Info. Michael. P.S.: Schnell mal Ace of Spades nachladen... ;) |
|
4)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Large upload Files
(Message 144)
Posted 9 Mar 2015 by Michael H.W. Weber
Post: Not a single result of my so far completed 61 WUs does exceed 1 MB in total size. On the mainpage I read 70 MB would be normal. Is there a problem with the WU batch which I am processing? In our forum over at Rechenkraft.net other people report the same situation. Michael. |
(English)
(Polski)